<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fundies Founded Modern Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthmatters.info/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthmatters.info/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science/</link>
	<description>Because the truth really does matter!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:50:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egha Pamungkas</title>
		<link>http://truthmatters.info/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egha Pamungkas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://afdave.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science-part-1/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Egha Pamungkas...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Fundies Founded Modern Science &#171; TruthMatters.info[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Egha Pamungkas&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Fundies Founded Modern Science &laquo; TruthMatters.info[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbie Room Decoration &#124; Barbie House Town</title>
		<link>http://truthmatters.info/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbie Room Decoration &#124; Barbie House Town]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://afdave.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science-part-1/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Barbie Room Decoration &#124; Barbie House Town...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Fundies Founded Modern Science &#171; TruthMatters.info[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Barbie Room Decoration | Barbie House Town&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Fundies Founded Modern Science &laquo; TruthMatters.info[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordkalvan</title>
		<link>http://truthmatters.info/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordkalvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://afdave.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/fundies-founded-modern-science-part-1/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The founders of modern science that you identify cannot have been fundamentalists as you claim because such a term only came into use, to quote Wikipedia, &#039;to describe a narrowly defined set of beliefs that developed into a movement within the US Protestant community in the early part of the 20th century. These religious principles stood in opposition to the modernist movement and espoused the strict adherence to and faith in religious &quot;fundamentals&quot;.&#039; (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism)

It is also the case that, the further you look into the discussions, work and conclusions of the Royal Society, the more obvious it becomes that its distinguished members very quickly came to an understanding that the Biblical account of creation was so at variance with the observed evidence that to treat it as anything other than metaphor and allegory would be foolish. Thus, if they were in any sense &#039;fundies&#039; as you claim (and I dispute), they soon abandoned such a narrow literalist belief-system in the face of the overwhelming evidence against it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The founders of modern science that you identify cannot have been fundamentalists as you claim because such a term only came into use, to quote Wikipedia, &#8216;to describe a narrowly defined set of beliefs that developed into a movement within the US Protestant community in the early part of the 20th century. These religious principles stood in opposition to the modernist movement and espoused the strict adherence to and faith in religious &#8220;fundamentals&#8221;.&#8217; (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism</a>)</p>
<p>It is also the case that, the further you look into the discussions, work and conclusions of the Royal Society, the more obvious it becomes that its distinguished members very quickly came to an understanding that the Biblical account of creation was so at variance with the observed evidence that to treat it as anything other than metaphor and allegory would be foolish. Thus, if they were in any sense &#8216;fundies&#8217; as you claim (and I dispute), they soon abandoned such a narrow literalist belief-system in the face of the overwhelming evidence against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

